Article/Intelligence
As DISH DBS Exchange Pits DTV Against DBS Noteholders, Each Side Shows Willingness to Negotiate Around Framework; Despite Sticking Points, Acquisition Serves Interests of All Acquisition Parties
- EchoStar yesterday, Oct. 28, announced an extension of its exchange offer and consent solicitations for DISH DBS Corp., or DBS, notes, with the exchange offer expiring on Nov. 12 at 5 p.m., ET as opposed to today. The new expiration time aligns with the final date to which EchoStar may extend the exchange under the DBS purchase agreement.
- Given the size of the ad hoc DBS noteholder group, which Octus has reported includes holders of over 80% of DBS notes principal, in our view the two-week extension sets the stage for a bilateral negotiation between the ad hoc DBS noteholder group and DirecTV. The initial exchange offer implied a minimum average principal participation level of 84% across each series of DBS notes, based on the exchange’s minimum discount capture requirement and proposed deal consideration, while the amended offer implies a 95% participation minimum requirement.
- Although sticking points remain, we believe that closure of the DirecTV acquisition is in the best interests of all transaction parties. In our opinion, a number of avenues exist to potentially close the gap between the parties, while downside risks for all parties remain if no agreement is reached. In Octus’ view, with two weeks remaining under the exchange, the amended exchange agreement and recent press reports are both indicative that the ad hoc DBS group and DirecTV are willing to work to a resolution under the proposed exchange framework.
- We expect normal-course tax-sharing payments and satellite lease payments, as well as a likely DBS-to-DNC third-quarter intercompany advance to consume the bulk of the $1.52 billion permitted cash transfer cap under the DirecTV purchase agreement. This cap provides for the payment of certain amounts from DBS to DNC for the period from July 1, 2024, to Sept. 30, 2025
Even so, according to Octus’ reporting on Oct. 25, the DBS noteholders asserted that DirecTV and DBS have so far excluded them in negotiations.
In a letter dated Oct. 24 from the DBS noteholder’s counsel, Milbank, to DirecTV’s counsel, Ropes & Gray, the noteholders stated that EchoStar is asking them to “voluntarily forfeit over $1.56 billion in value they are owed.” The Milbank group represents holders of over 80% of the aggregate DBS notes principal, according to Octus’ reporting, with certain members party to an ongoing lawsuit that alleges that EchoStar’s January reorganization transactions amounted to fraudulent transfers.
However, while sticking points remain, based on last week’s Financial Times report of the DBS noteholders’ willingness to realize an approximately $300 million discount and EchoStar’s recently reduced minimum principal reduction amount and increased consideration amount in the amended exchange offer, both sides appear willing to negotiate around EchoStar’s proposed exchange framework.
Ultimately, Octus believes that closure of the DirecTV acquisition is in the best interests of all transaction parties, including the dissenting DBS noteholders. A failure to consummate the DirecTV transaction leaves the DBS notes at a credit box with less credit support and earnings power going forward. Further, to the extent that the transaction is not consummated, absent legal intervention or a settlement, DBS noteholders would be exposed to the risks of further cash distributions from DBS to DNC, new liability management exercises and related notes pricing pressure as year-end approaches.
Separately, TPG Angelo Gordon, which plans to increase its 30% stake in DirecTV to 100% ownership, now controls DBS’ unrestricted subsidiary DBS Issuer LLC, or SubscriberCo, via its new preferred equity stake and holds at least $1.8 billion in subscriber-backed term loans at the entity, each of which subordinates legacy DBS noteholders with respect to the subscribers at SubscriberCo. According to sources, if the DirecTV acquisition does not close, the capacity of TPG’s SubscriberCo rollup term loans, also known as a hunter-gatherer facility, expands from $500 million to $1.5 billion, potentially further subordinating legacy DBS bondholders with respect to the SubscriberCo assets.
Additionally, EchoStar announced on Oct. 10 that it had satisfied the ongoing DNC convertible notes exchange offer’s minimum tender participation threshold, setting the company on course to strip the restrictive covenants from its convertible notes.
Combined, these developments, and the possibility of a refinancing of the DNC 11.75% secured notes in May 2025, potentially make any future liability management exercises at DBS more potent as they provide EchoStar with options in how it ultimately treats DBS.
A summary of the broader EchoStar complex of companies is shown below. With holders representing over 90% of DNC’s convertible notes participating in the DNC notes exchange, following consummation of the exchange, fewer than $490 million of the convertible notes will remain outstanding. The 11.75% DNC secured notes due 2027 will be the only issuance at DNC with restrictive covenants.
Given the two weeks remaining until the amended exchange expires and indications that both the DBS noteholders and DirecTV are willing to negotiate around the framework of the existing exchange offer, the lack of direct negotiations thus far do not alter our expectation that a mutually satisfactory agreement will be reached with the DBS noteholders.
Financial Times, citing sources, reported that DBS noteholders have pushed to narrow the initially proposed $1.568 billion discount to about $300 million. Under the terms of the proposed new notes, this discount would be realized upon the consummation of DirecTV’s acquisition. On DirecTV’s side, the Oct. 28 amended exchange offer includes a reduction of the minimum discount amount to $1.499 billion and increases in the exchange consideration provided to the DBS unsecured noteholders.
Octus has reported that DBS noteholders disagree with:
- The covenants under the exchange consideration notes that have not been disclosed publicly; and
- The purchase agreement’s permitted cash transfer cap, which allows DBS to transfer up to $1.52 billion in cash or other consideration to EchoStar over the period of July 1, 2024, to Sept. 30, 2025.
For DirecTV, we believe that two significant factors, among others, are driving its exchange participation requirement:
- DirecTV’s targeted closing leverage: DirecTV stated that, at closing, it “expects to have a leverage position just over 2.0x, and plans to reduce to under 2.0x within 12 months, consistent with its stated 1.5x – 2.0x financial policy on a pro forma basis.”
- Elimination of DBS indentures’ cross-default provisions: The indentures governing each of DBS’ outstanding notes include cross-default provisions that are triggered if DNC commences a voluntary bankruptcy proceeding or consents to relief against it in an involuntary bankruptcy. Since these provisions present external risks to the go-forward DirecTV capital structure, it is likely important to DirecTV to remove them. Amending the cross-default provisions requires the consent of the holders of a majority in principal amount for each respective series of notes.
Notably, according to sources, the exchanging DBS noteholders would retain their litigation rights to the extent that the DirecTV acquisition does not close.
Current trading volumes are limited by the size of the DBS co-op group, but, in our view, pricing for the DBS notes and the yield of DirecTV’s outstanding secured notes indicate that market participants expect a certain amount of discount, via the exchange consideration and/or consideration trading prices, to be realized by DBS noteholders.
The aforementioned $1.52 billion permitted cash transfer cap provides for the payment of certain amounts from DBS to DNC from July 1, 2024, to Sept. 30, 2025. These include normal course tax-sharing payments and satellite lease payments.
DBS and DNC have historically operated under a tax-sharing agreement under which DBS has sent recurring tax payments to DNC. It is Octus’ understanding that, under this arrangement, the entities share a taxable income base with the combined entities benefiting, from a tax perspective, from the losses incurred at DNC. Thus, these payments from DBS, at least in part, would otherwise likely be made to applicable tax authorities if the arrangement ceased.
Additionally, the transfer cap allows for new intercompany loans. Based on historical trends, DBS’ payment capacity and DNC’s cash needs, Octus estimates that DBS likely advanced roughly $500 million in intercompany loans to DNC during the third quarter. While these would have occurred prior to the announcement of the DirecTV transaction, they would be counted in the cap.
As summarized below, combined, the 15 months of anticipated tax and satellite payments as well as the third-quarter intercompany loan advances might account for roughly $1.3 billion to $1.4 billion of the $1.52 billion in allowed transfers.
Octus’ summary of the purchase agreement’s permitted cash transfer cap provision is below. It is notable that the purchase agreement specifically states that the proceeds from up to $500 million in SubscriberCo incremental term loans, which it states are expected to be $480 million on a net basis, would count toward the $1.52 million permitted transfer cap. It would not surprise us if EchoStar reports that such a payment was made following the third quarter end.