Skip to content

Article/Intelligence

CASE SUMMARY: Rite Aid Says Goal of ‘Chapter 22’ is Going-Concern Sale; ABL Lenders to Fund Case With $1.94B DIP; Prescriptions ‘Most Valuable Asset’

New Rite Aid LLC and dozens of affiliates filed chapter 11 petitions in the District of New Jersey on May 5, 248 days after the pharmacy and drugstore operator emerged from its prior chapter 11 reorganization in the same court. The company “intends to achieve value-maximizing sales of stores and/or prescriptions,” according to the first day declaration of Chief Transformation Officer Marc Liebman of Alvarez & Marsal.

Rite Aid proposes a $1.94 billion senior secured superpriority DIP facility from its prepetition ABL lenders, made up of a $1.7 billion asset-based revolving credit facility and a $240 million DIP first-in, last-out, or FILO, term loan facility.

The debtors seek approval of bidding procedures to govern the sale of their assets, highlighting that their prescription files are their most valuable asset. The sale would proceed on an expedited timeline in two phases, with the pharmacy assets to be sold first and then nonpharmacy assets (plus any unsold pharmacy assets remaining from the first phase). The debtors will separately undertake store closing sales at certain locations.

The DIP facility requires the debtors to hold auctions (if any) by May 14 (for pharmacy assets) and June 20 (for remaining assets), and secure sale approval orders by May 21 (for pharmacy assets) and June 25 (for remaining assets).

“The Debtors’ prepetition marketing process resulted in six indications of interest for various parts of the Debtors’ businesses, along with one indication of interest for the combined purchase of substantially all of the Debtors’ prescription files and certain parts of their inventory,” the debtors say. According to the debtors, the seven potential purchasers include “a combination of national and regional retail pharmacy, grocery store, and general retail companies.”

Liebman says that Rite Aid sold or wound down approximately 800 underperforming stores across the country during the 2023 bankruptcy and closed an additional 29 stores since emergence. The debtors have entered into purchase agreements with buyers of prescription files for over 60 stores that they intend to consummate in chapter 11. Approximately 50 stores are expected to close with no prescription sales, and an additional 275 stores “have or will have asset purchase agreements for regional transactions in process.”

The company blames its rapid return to bankruptcy court on “unforeseen challenges that significantly impaired” its nonpharmacy “front-end” business, including vendors’ refusal to return to less restrictive pre-bankruptcy payment terms after emergence and ABL lenders’ refusal to provide letter of credit facilities “crucial to Rite Aid’s recovery.”

The first day hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, May 7, at 2 p.m. ET.

The case has been assigned to Judge Michael B. Kaplan (case No. 25-14861), who also handled the company’s first chapter 11. The debtors are advised by Paul Weiss and Cole Schotz as bankruptcy counsel, Guggenheim Securities as investment banker, Alvarez & Marsal as financial advisor and A&G Realty Partners as real estate consultant.

Prepetition Capital Structure

Liebman says that the debtors have approximately $2.161 billion in aggregate funded debt outstanding.

A breakdown of the company’s prepetition capital structure is below:
 

Prepetition ABL Facility and FILO Term Loan

The $1.9 billion ABL facility, reduced from $2.25 billion as part of the first amendment, and $240 million FILO term loan are secured and guaranteed by first-priority liens on substantially all personal and real property of substantially all of Rite Aid Corp. and its subsidiaries, including each of the debtors.

Rite Aid’s prepetition ABL facility was subject to a borrowing base formula whereby the facility’s availability was the minimum of either the $1.9 billion in commitments or the company’s net orderly liquidation value.

The ABL had a daily cash sweep feature that swept all cash received by the company into an account designated for ABL repayment. As a result, the company heavily relied on the ABL for day-to-day liquidity. The borrower, Rite Aid Corp., was also subject to a minimum borrowing availability of $225 million (the stated amount upon emergence from the previous chapter 11 cases).

An illustration of the company’s collateral availability (gray), compared with the excess availability (solid black line), and the amended excess availability requirement (dotted red line), is shown below:
 

The prepetition credit facilities mature on Aug. 30, 2028.

Senior Secured Notes

Rite Aid Corp. issued three tranches of senior secured notes, collectively referred to as the senior secured notes:
 

  • $78.3 million of floating rate senior secured PIK notes due 2031, referred to as 1.5 lien notes. The balance as of the petition date is $83 million.
     
  • $375 million of third lien notes consisting of:
     
    • $225 million of 15% third-priority Series A senior secured PIK notes due 2031. The balance as of the petition date is $242 million.
    • $125 million of 15% third-priority Series B senior secured PIK notes due 2031. The balance as of the petition date is $35 million. The Series B notes are subordinated in right of payment to the Series A notes.

The senior secured notes are guaranteed by substantially all of Rite Aid Corp.’s subsidiaries, including each subsidiary that is a debtor.

The 1.5 lien notes, which are junior to the prepetition credit facilities, are secured by substantially all personal and real property of Rite Aid Corp. and its subsidiaries, including each debtor.

The third lien notes are secured by third-priority liens on the prepetition collateral, which includes substantially all personal and real property of Rite Aid Corp. and its subsidiaries, including each of the debtors. The third lien notes are junior to the liens securing the prepetition credit facilities, the 1.5 lien notes and the McKesson obligations.

McKesson Obligations

The McKesson obligations are secured by substantially all personal and real property of Rite Aid Corp. and its subsidiaries, including each debtor. The McKesson obligations rank senior to the third lien notes and junior in priority to the prepetition credit facilities and the 1.5 lien notes. The outstanding amount of these obligations is not provided.

The debtors list McKesson as holding contingent unliquidated claims on the petition’s list of largest unsecured claim holders.

1970 Group Letter of Credit

According to the declaration, Rite Aid Corp. is responsible for $66.75 million in letters of credit issued by the 1970 Group, an arranger of letters of credit supported by third-party financial institutions. The letter of credit is guaranteed by substantially all of Rite Aid Corp.’s subsidiaries, including all debtors.

Background / Events Leading to Bankruptcy Filing

Liebman says that Rite Aid’s corporate roots date to 1962, when it began as a single discount drug store in Scranton, Pa., operating with the name of Thrif D Discount Center. By 1968, Liebman says, Rite Aid went public on the American Stock Exchange. It grew to the third-largest retail drug chain in the country by 1981, according to Liebman.

Rite Aid’s organizational chart can be found HERE.

The Rite Aid business model relies on “two separate, but symbiotic functions,” Liebman says. Its prescription drug business employs pharmacists to serve customers’ pharmaceutical needs. Rite Aid depends on those same customers to drive its “front-end” retail business, which offers nonprescription products, such as health and beauty products and convenience items.

Rite Aid has primarily relied on its partnership with McKesson Corp. to fulfill its prescription drug requirements. It entered into a new supply agreement with McKesson after it emerged from its 2023 chapter 11 cases, Liebman says. Under the agreement, Rite Aid purchases almost all of its pharmaceutical products from McKesson, according to Liebman.

Rite Aid used to operate a pharmacy benefit manager business, or PBM business, out of its “Elixir” entities, Liebman says, but during its 2023 cases it sold the Elixir business to MedImpact for $575 million. MedImpact is appealing a decision that resolved a $275 million post-Elixir sale dispute in Rite Aid’s favor.

Rite Aid first filed for chapter 11 in the District of New Jersey on Oct. 15, 2023. Liebman says that at the time of filing, the company had $4 billion in funded debt, costing the company about $200 million a year in debt service obligations. The company filed its 2023 chapter 11 case to right-size its balance sheet and exit underperforming leases.

Liebman recounts that the chapter 11 case was fraught with conflict. “[T]he 2023 Cases proved to be extremely complex and contentious, and involved numerous counterparties with competing interests that each vigorously negotiated for the best possible treatment during a protracted mediation process. At several points in time, it appeared that a global consensual path forward did not exist,” he says.

Liebman, however, says that the debtors ultimately confirmed a plan with the support of 99.73% of voting creditors. Through the plan, according to Liebman, Rite Aid set up trusts to hold causes of action, insurance rights and cash for the benefit of creditors. In addition, 90% of new equity interests were issued by Rite Aid HoldCo to the company’s prepetition noteholders and 10% of new equity interests were issued to a trust for the benefit of general unsecured creditors. Liebman says that junior DIP claims – held by prepetition secured second lien noteholders – were rolled into exit 1.5 lien notes. Prepetition second lien noteholders also received third lien notes, Liebman says.

Liebman says that the plan included a waterfall provision to distribute proceeds from significant 2023 receivables due from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to various parties. The plan also provided for the global resolution of tort liability through a channeling injunction, tying tort claimants’ recoveries to the success of a litigation trust. Finally, Liebman says, the plan included a global settlement with McKesson, which provided McKesson with a second-priority lien on substantially all of the debtors’ property to secure the debtors’ obligations under the new McKesson supply agreement.

Liebman says that Rite Aid sold or wound down approximately 800 stores during its 2023 cases – including substantially all of its stores in Michigan and Ohio.

The company emerged from its first chapter 11 case in August 2024 with a business plan that assumed two things, according to Liebman: that Rite Aid’s front-end vendors would offer better payment terms and that the company would be able to negotiate letter of credit facilities that would provide crucial liquidity.

Neither of those assumptions proved true, however. Liebman says that the company obtained “materially less” letters of credit than expected and that “many vendors did not relax their restrictive payment terms at anticipated levels.” For instance, Liebman says that the company expected to emerge from the 2023 cases with about $166 million in liquidity from letters of credit but only obtained a letter of credit facility for $66.75 million. Further, Rite Aid’s deteriorating financial condition caused McKesson to tighten credit terms, Liebman says.

The inability to procure sufficient liquidity through letters of credit and the continued insistence by vendors for restrictive payment terms – such as cash on delivery – impaired Rite Aid’s ability to stock its front-end business, Liebman says. In addition, macroeconomic pressures, such as lower consumer spending, strained vendor relations, inventory challenges and competitive pressures – left Rite Aid unable to service debt obligations in the ordinary course, according to Liebman. Liebman says that since November 2024, the company has only generated negative adjusted EBITDA.

According to Liebman, in early 2025, the company was at risk of breaching a minimum ABL availability covenant. The company was able to amend its ABL facility to free up incremental liquidity, according to Liebman, but he says “the financial reprieve” was “short lived.” The incremental liquidity was insufficient to restock front-end inventory or convince trade creditors to normalize trade terms, Liebman adds.

On Feb. 24, Liebman says that the company breached its modified minimum ABL availability covenant. Facing the possibility of the ABL lenders exercising enforcement remedies, Liebman says that the company and its ABL lenders executed a series of consents that allowed Rite Aid to develop a business rationalization plan and implement a comprehensive sale and marketing process for its business and assets.

Liebman says that the company hired restructuring advisors in March and hired three independent directors with restructuring expertise – Tim Pohl, Michael Wartell and Scott Vogel. On April 3, Liebman says, it entered into an agreement with a joint venture formed between Hilco Merchant Resources and SB360 Capital Partners to receive asset divestment and monetization advisory services.

Liebman says the chapter 11 cases follow a prepetition marketing process that the company began in March with the assistance of its investment banker, Guggenheim Securities. According to Liebman, Rite Aid’s prescriptions are its most valuable asset, and Rite Aid has already signed purchase agreements for its prescription files at more than 60 store locations. Liebman adds that there are also about 50 store locations planned for closure with no expected prescription sales and 275 store locations that have or will have asset purchase agreements for regional transactions in process.

 

The debtors’ largest unsecured creditors are as follows:
 

10 Largest Unsecured Creditors
Creditor Location Claim Type Amount
Ace American
Insurance Co.
Philadelphia Insurance
Claim
$   87,421,089
Department Of Justice Washington Plan Payment
Claim
49,000,000
AmerisourceBergen
Drug Corp.
Conshohocken, Pa. Trade 29,850,072
UFCW Local 8-Golden
State
Roseville, Calif. Union Claim 19,501,087
United Food and
Commercial Workers
Local 1167
Bloomington, Calif. Union Claim 18,672,466
Google Inc. Mountain View, Calif. Trade 18,315,913
Chattem Inc. Chattanooga, Tenn. Trade 12,698,496
HCL America Inc. Sunnyvale, Calif. Trade 11,191,439
32-14 31st Food
LLC
New York Lease
Rejection
Damage
Claim
9,405,233
PriceWaterHouseCoopers LLP New York Trade 7,950,923

The case representatives are as follows:

 
Representatives
Role Name Firm Location
Debtors’
Co-Counsel
Andrew N. Rosenberg

Alice Belisle Eaton

Christopher Hopkins

Sean A. Mitchell

Paul Weiss New York
Debtors’
Co-Counsel
Michael D. Sirota

Warren A. Usatine

Felice R. Yudkin

Seth Van Aalten

Cole Schotz Hackensack, N.J.
Debtors’ Special 
Counsel
Elise S. Frejka Frejka New York
Debtors’
Investment
Banker
Adam Rifkin

Jeff Cohen

Brendan Hayes

Andrew Herrera

Guggenheim Securities New York
Debtors’
Financial
Advisor
Marc Liebman Alvarez
& Marsal
Phoenix
Debtors’ Real
Estate Advisor
NA A&G Realty
Partners
NA
Co-Counsel to
the Prepetition
ABL Agent and
DIP Agent
John F. Ventola

Jonathan D. Marshall

Mark D. Silva

Choate, Hall Boston
Co-Counsel to
the Prepetition
ABL Agent and
DIP Agent
Alan J. Brody

Julia Frost-Davies

Oscar N. Pinkas

Greenberg
Traurig
Florham Park, N.J.
U.S. Trustee Jeffrey Sponder

Lauren Bielski

Office of the
U.S. Trustee
Newark, N.J.
Debtors’ Claims Agent Benjamin J. Steele Kroll New York

DIP Financing Motion

The debtors ask the court to approve a $1.94 billion senior secured superpriority DIP facility from prepetition ABL lenders, made up of a $1.7 billion asset-based revolving credit facility and a $240 million DIP first-in, last-out, or FILO, term loan facility, and the consensual use of cash collateral. Bank of America would act as DIP agent. The DIP facilities would support Rite Aid’s working capital and other funding needs similar to the prepetition credit facilities – which the DIP would refinance – while improving on certain aspects of the prepetition revolving facility, according to the DIP motion.

On an interim basis, the refinancing of the prepetition credit facilities would occur via a “creeping” rollup, whereby the debtors estimate that approximately $600 million of revolving loans under the ABL facility would be refinanced with rollup DIP revolving loans under the interim DIP order. Upon entry of a final order, any outstanding obligations under the prepetition ABL facility would be converted into obligations under the DIP revolving facility, and the DIP FILO facility would fully refinance the prepetition FILO facility in full.

The DIP facilities would mature one year from the closing date (undefined in the draft DIP agreement attached to the motion). The DIP revolving facility provides for interest at a margin of 2.25% on alternate base rate borrowings and 3.25% on SOFR borrowings, with a 0.50% unused line fee and a 1% upfront fee paid in kind. The DIP FILO facility provides for interest at a margin of 4.25% on alternate base rate borrowings and 5.25% on SOFR borrowings, with a 1.5% upfront fee paid in kind. The interest rates under the DIP facilities are the same as under the prepetition credit facilities, the debtors note.

The DIP facilities also provide for a 0.5% commitment fee, 0.125% letter of credit fee, upfront fees of 1% on the DIP revolving facility and 1.5% on the DIP FILO facility, and a 10% backstop fee. Additionally, the DIP facilities have an exit fee of 10% of the sum of the commitments under the DIP revolving facility and the commitments under the DIP FILO, in each case payable in cash only upon the earlier of the maturity date and the repayment of the obligations under the DIP facilities (including, for the DIP revolving loans, a permanent reduction in the underlying commitments).

The debtors propose to grant all-asset liens to secure the DIP financing. The DIP collateral would include the proceeds of avoidance actions upon entry of the final order. The debtors provide a lien priority waterfall HERE.

The company proposes the following adequate protection to its prepetition lenders: replacement liens, allowed superpriority administrative expense claims, financial reporting, professional fees and expenses of the ABL agent, and interest at the default rate set forth in the prepetition ABL documents until all prepetition revolving loans and prepetition FILO loans have been fully rolled up into the rollup DIP revolving loans and rollup DIP FILO loans.

In addition, the debtors propose a waiver of the estates’ right to seek to surcharge collateral pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 506(c) and the “equities of the case” exception under section 552(b), both upon entry of the final order.

The post-termination carve-out for professional fees is $4 million if triggered before June 20 and $2.5 million if triggered after June 20.

The debtors say the DIP budget will be filed in advance of their first day hearing.

The DIP financing is subject to the following milestones:
 

  • May 6: Deadline to file store closing motion;
     
  • May 7: Deadline to distribute informational packages and solicitations for bids for specified retail and pharmacy assets;
     
  • May 8: Entry of interim DIP order, bidding procedures order and interim store closing order;
     
  • May 13: Binding bid deadline;
     
  • May 14: Deadline to hold auction for specified retail and pharmacy assets;
     
  • May 16 (or one day after auction, if later): Deadline to submit notice identifying remaining assets;
     
  • May 21 (or three days after auction, if earlier): Updated budget due / specified retail and pharmacy sale hearing;
     
  • May 22: Deadline to distribute informational packages and solicitations for bids on specified other assets;
     
  • May 23: Deadline for court to enter specified retail and pharmacy sale order;
     
  • May 30: Nonbinding indications of interest for specified other assets due;
     
  • June 9: Entry of final DIP order / final store closing order / order extending section 365(d)(4) deadline;
     
  • June 13: Binding bids for specified other assets due;
     
  • June 20: Deadline to conduct auction for specified other assets, if necessary;
     
  • June 25: Sale hearing for specified other assets; and
     
  • June 27 (or three days after the other assets auction, if earlier): Deadline to submit updated approved budget.
     

The lien challenge deadline is 60 days after the formation of the official committee of unsecured creditors for the UCC and 60 days after entry of the interim DIP order for other parties. The proposed UCC lien investigation budget is $100,000.

The proposed final DIP order would require the debtors to pay $2 million to the ABL agent to secure indemnification obligations.

Rite Aid asserts that the proposed DIP financing is the best funding available. The debtors say they discussed DIP financing with certain other existing creditors, but “certain intercreditor and practical limitations prevented such discussions from progressing.” Specifically, the intercreditor agreements prohibit holders of senior secured notes and McKesson from providing any debt with priming liens on the prepetition collateral without the consent of the prepetition ABL lenders, the debtors explain.

Because the prepetition ABL lenders “were not willing or were otherwise unable to obtain requisite lender consent to allow third-party capital” to prime the prepetition credit facility obligations or come in on a pari passu basis, the debtors say they could not obtain incremental capital from parties other than the prepetition ABL lenders. Similar factors created challenges for potential DIP financing from a third party, the debtors add.

The debtors also say they believed that pursuing an exhaustive DIP marketing process would have spread news of the bankruptcy, causing further customer attrition. The debtors say they did not pursue that path because “the realities of the Debtors’ business and capital structure would have rendered such efforts at best futile, and at worst, value-destructive.”

Rite Aid adds that the DIP facilities have benefits that would likely be unavailable from third-party financing, including a 12-month tenor, fees paid in kind instead of in cash, an interest rate that is the same as the rate under the prepetition credit facilities, and the accrual of interest on prepetition credit facility obligations to be rolled up into the DIP facilities at the nondefault rate.

Ultimately, the debtors determined that potential alternate DIP financing proposals (if any) would either “(a) fail to offer more Company-favorable terms than the DIP Facilities, (b) fail to comprehensively address the Debtors’ postpetition funding needs, or (c) entail greater execution risk than the DIP Facilities, in particular because the Debtors’ existing Prepetition ABL Lenders were unwilling to subordinate their liens and claims to such financings.”

Bidding Procedures Motion

The debtors say that they contacted 38 parties potentially interested in purchasing all of their assets. Of the 38, 21 executed confidentiality agreements, and 20 were provided access to a data room. The diligence process resulted in six indications of interest for various parts of the business, the debtors say, as well as one indication of interest for the combined purchase of substantially all of the debtors’ prescription files and certain parts of their inventory. The debtors say that all seven parties are continuing to conduct diligence.

The debtors warn that “customers may anticipate store closures and attempt to transfer their prescriptions to another pharmacy.” Therefore, the debtors are seeking authority to quickly conduct a sale process incorporating bidding procedures that can be found HERE.

The debtors request approval of the following sale timeline:

Pharmacy Asset Sale Schedule
 

  • May 13 (6 a.m. ET): Bid deadline;
     
  • May 14 (9 a.m. ET): Auction;
     
  • May 16 (5 p.m. ET): Proposed sale order due;
     
  • May 19 (5 p.m. ET): Sale objections due; and
     
  • May 21: Sale hearing.

Remaining Asset Sale Schedule
 

  • May 30 (5 p.m ET): Indications of interest due;
     
  • June 13 (5 p.m. ET): Bid deadline;
     
  • June 20 (9 a.m. ET): Auction;
     
  • June 21 (5 p.m. ET): Proposed sale order due;
     
  • June 23 (5 p.m. ET): Sale objections due; and
     
  • June 25: Sale hearing.

The debtors also say they will serve notices of successful bidders as soon as reasonably practicable after the conclusion or cancellation of auctions.

In support of the bid procedures motion, the debtors filed a declaration from Adam Rifki of Guggenheim.

Other Motions

The debtors also filed various standard first day motions, including the following:
 

  • Motion for joint administration
    • The cases will be jointly administered under case No. 25-14861.
  • Motion to establish procedures for the sale of certain leases and fee owned properties
  • Motion to reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases
  • Motion to pay critical vendors
    • The debtors request authority to pay approximately $3 million in critical vendor claims during the interim period.
  • Motion to maintain customer programs
    • The debtors request authority to honor customer programs and estimate $16 million in prepetition customer programs obligations.
  • Motion to establish claims trading procedures and motion to establish stock trading procedures
    • The debtors seek to establish trading procedures for trading in certain claims against the debtors’ estates and trading in debtor common stock, to be able to object to and prevent transfers if necessary to preserve net operating losses. The debtors have about $3.05 billion in NOLs, $574 million of 163(j) carryforwards, and approximately $11 million of business tax credits and certain other tax attributes.
  • Motion to pay employee wages and benefits
    • The debtors seek authority to pay approximately $205.1 million in associate wages and benefits on an interim and final basis.
  • Motion to use cash management system
    • The company has bank accounts with Bank of America, Banner Bank, BB&T, BNY Mellon, Chase, Citizens Bank New Hampshire, Comerica, Fifth Third, First Niagara, Fulton Bank, Huntington, KeyBank, M&T, Plumas, PNC, Premier Valley Bank, Santander, TD Bank, U.S. Bank, Webster Bank, Wells Fargo and WSFS Financial Corp.
  • Motion to maintain insurance programs
  • Motion to pay taxes and fees
    • The debtors seek authority to pay prepetition accrued and unpaid taxes as they become due on an interim and final basis, estimating $19.8 million taxes and fees due in the interim period and $41.3 million accrued and unpaid as of the petition date.
  • Motion to provide utilities with adequate assurance
  • Application to appoint Kroll as claims agent
  • Motion to extend time to file schedules
  • Motion to file consolidated list of creditors
  • Motion to establish procedures for de minimis asset transactions

Octus subscribers can access all linked documents here: https://app.octus.com/v3#/items/intel/4929?item_id=317782