Skip to content

Article

Oracle Force Majeure Sparks Investor Anxiety Over Data Center Financing Documentation and Political Pushback

✨ Summary by AI at Octus
Oracle's force majeure notice for Project Jupiter, a large data center in New Mexico, has prompted investors to reassess risks related to local government opposition and the implications of force majeure clauses in financing agreements. The notice allows Oracle to reduce rent payments during project delays, impacting the $18 billion loan backing the development. This situation highlights the evolving nature of data center financing documentation, particularly concerning force majeure provisions. Political scrutiny on data center regulations is increasing, with potential implications for future developments, as seen in New Mexico and Virginia, while federal legislation on data center electricity costs faces challenges in the Senate.
Reporting: Ayse Kelce

Oracle’s recent force majeure notice at Project Jupiter has forced data center investors to rethink the scope of risks associated with local municipalities pushing back on data centers and how force majeure provisions map across various deal documentations, sources say.

Oracle sent out a force majeure notice to the developer of “Project Jupiter,” a massive data center in New Mexico, which is facing delays. The force majeure allows Oracle to pay less rent while the project’s development remains delayed, Bloomberg reported last week. The project was financed with a $18 billion privately syndicated loan backed by Oracle payments made through a triple-net lease.
 

(Click HERE to enlarge.)

Although the force majeure clause may not be news for the market, any setback concerning a massive financing will have ripple effects in a growing asset class and is enough to create unease in the market, according to sources.

The debt tied to Project Jupiter was privately syndicated, but other deals where Oracle backs debt service through a triple net lease include RD Michigan Property Owner I LLC, which issued $14 billion senior secured notes in April that are rated BBB/Baa3. The bonds traded down to 91.41 today from 93.7 on Sept. 21 and traded down from par to the mid-90s in July, according to IHS Markit.

Data center financings do not often come to market with standard language that investors are familiar with, sources said. As the market continues to underwrite and digest these massive deals, documentation is likely to evolve, including the language around force majeure clauses.

Although every data center deal includes some form of a force majeure clause, some can be more friendly for the data center operator, and others are better for the lessee, according to sources.

Despite the negative noise, however, the primary market was open to data center deals last week

Digital Drive priced $1.085 billion of secured notes at a 8.875% coupon and 98.5 OID, equating to a yield of roughly 9.25% last week, Octus reported. Bonds traded up on the break to 99.25 on Sept. 23, according to MarketAxess, before ultimately falling back with the rest of the market to last trade at 96.6.

With the midterm elections coming up in November, local politicians have been focusing on data center regulations more than ever, sources say. In turn, investors have started focusing more on the favorability of a given data center’s location than ever before.

A given region’s hospitality to data centers will differ not only by state but often by city. While some investors believe that political obstacles will have longevity, others believe the pressure will ease after the midterms.

In Oracle’s case, New Mexico Democratic gubernatorial candidate Deb Haaland has said she would call for pausing new large-scale data center developments if elected. However, Haaland, the former U.S. secretary of the interior, has reportedly received donations from Oracle executives, and it remains to be seen if she would include Project Jupiter in the category of new data centers to be paused.

Various states have already moved to enforce frameworks restraining data center development. A recent example is Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s Sept. 18 framework, which she argues is designed to protect the state’s ratepayers, impose environmental standards and bolster community input on local approval processes.

On the federal level, the U.S. House of Representatives on Sept. 16 overwhelmingly approved legislation requiring state public utility commissions to consider strategies to make data center operators cover incremental electricity costs instead of passing those costs on to consumers, Octus legal analysts wrote. The bill hit a snag in the Senate, but the upper chamber could still revisit the legislation, possibly as soon as this week.

In the end, some sources say, these data centers will get built, but the spreads for the associated borrowing will widen based on counterparty risk rather than local government risk. Counterparties will really dictate where the spread will be, they added.

Oracle’s stock is down more than 11% this month, last trading at $133.1, giving the company a $402.47 billion market capitalization.

Oracle did not respond to a request for comment.

This publication has been prepared by Octus Intelligence, Inc. or one of its affiliates (collectively, "Octus") and is being provided to the recipient in connection with a subscription to one or more Octus products. Recipient’s use of the Octus platform is subject to Octus Terms of Use or the user agreement pursuant to which the recipient has access to the platform (the “Applicable Terms”). The recipient of this publication may not redistribute or republish any portion of the information contained herein other than with Octus express written consent or in accordance with the Applicable Terms. The information in this publication is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, investment, accounting or other professional advice on any subject matter or as a substitute for such advice. The recipient of this publication must comply with all applicable laws, including laws regarding the purchase and sale of securities. Octus obtains information from a wide variety of sources, which it believes to be reliable, but Octus does not make any representation, warranty, or certification as to the materiality or public availability of the information in this publication or that such information is accurate, complete, comprehensive or fit for a particular purpose. Recipients must make their own decisions about investment strategies or securities mentioned in this publication. Octus and its officers, directors, partners and employees expressly disclaim all liability relating to or arising from actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the information contained in this publication. © 2026 Octus. All rights reserved. Octus(TM) and the Octus logo are trademarks of Octus Intelligence, Inc.